Shannon Cruthis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) appeals the district court’s remand of this ERISA case to Illinois state court, and argues that the case should be heard in federal court. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse.
I. Background
Shannon Cruthis alleges that she became disabled in 2001. She therefore sought to recover the benefits she believed were due under the terms of her employee benefit plan. However, her insurer, Met-Life, refused to pay the benefits.
Cruthis subsequently filed suit against MetLife in Illinois state court, alleging violations of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aar International, Incorporated v. Nimelias Enterprises S.A., Vacances Heliades S.A. And Princess Airlines S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- The Clorox Company v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Carol Stower, Real PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Autoridad De Energ a Electrica De Puerto Rico v. Ericsson Inc., F/k/a Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. Federal Insurance Company John DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Fanney v. Trigon InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Yurcik v. SHEET METAL WORKERS'INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ballew v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Kamm v. ITEX CORP.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- FindWhere Holdings, Inc. v. Systems Environment Optimization, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Evans v. Employee Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Myers v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss., Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.