Legal Opinion

Young v. Guess & Swanson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 27, 1905No. 15,457PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jackson; M. F. Machen, Judge. Action by R. E. Young and others against Guess & Swanson. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action on a note for $2,000, interest thereon, and fee of attorney, and at the same time obtained a writ of sequestration, and had seized property on which they claimed a vendor’s privilege.

The defendants moved for the dissolution of the writ of sequestration on the ground that the affidavit was untrue, and that they were not about to remove their property out of the jurisdiction of the court to defraud their creditors.

With reference to bills of exception, six in number were reserved to the court’s ruling during the trial, charging as many errors in the court’s ruling.

T…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Jackson v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Hicks v. LevettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. City Bank and Trust v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API