Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Barnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1938No. Civ. 2189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

—This is an action to quiet title to a mining claim. The complaint is in the usual form alleging, among other things, that the plaintiff is the owner of a described piece of property, the claim being known as “Bristol No. One”, and that the original location notice was recorded on July 2, 1936. The defendants answered and also filed a cross-complaint, alleging that on April 10, 1934, they discovered and located a mining claim which they named “Big Sulphur Claim” and describing the same as it was described in the recorded notice of location, a copy of which is attached to the cross-complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Darger v. Le SieurUtah Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Ehrhart v. BowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Pease v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API