Dennis v. Barnett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
—This is an action to quiet title to a mining claim. The complaint is in the usual form alleging, among other things, that the plaintiff is the owner of a described piece of property, the claim being known as “Bristol No. One”, and that the original location notice was recorded on July 2, 1936. The defendants answered and also filed a cross-complaint, alleging that on April 10, 1934, they discovered and located a mining claim which they named “Big Sulphur Claim” and describing the same as it was described in the recorded notice of location, a copy of which is attached to the cross-complaint…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Darger v. Le SieurUtah Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ehrhart v. BowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Pease v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951