Legal Opinion
Chicago Insurance v. Halcond
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 21, 1999No. 98 Civ. 4528 (LAK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
This is an action to declare that (1) a policy of insurance issued to defendant Frank Halcond is void ab initio and may be rescinded, and (2) the plaintiff is not obligated to defend Halcond in two personal injury cases brought against him. Discovery having been completed, plaintiff moves for summary judgment.
Facts
The Initial Application
Frank Halcond has practiced as a nurse/anesthetist since 1970.
On March 26, 1996, he applied to plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company (“Chicago”) for an Individual Nurse Anesthetist Professional Liability claims-made…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Starter Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Converse, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- American Insurance Company v. Fairchild Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Bronx Savings Bank v. WeigandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United National Insurance v. Granoff, Walker & Forlenza, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Acquest Holdings, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Chicago Insurance v. BorsodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Cade & Saunders, P.C. v. Chicago InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. Beach Cruiser, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025