Legal Opinion
Cade & Saunders, P.C. v. Chicago Insurance
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2004No. 1:02-cv-01203PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, Senior District Judge.
In this action, plaintiffs Cade & Saunders, P.C. and William J. Cade, Esq. 1 are seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant, Chicago Insurance Company (“CIC”), has a duty to defend and indemnify them in the underlying legal malpractice action, Nigro v. Cade & Saunders, P.C., et al., currently pending in the Supreme Court of New York, Albany County. CIC moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, seeking (1) dismissal of the complaint with prejudice; and (2) a declaration that it does not have a duty to defend or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weiss v. La SuisseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Indian Harbor Insurance v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Cade & Saunders, P.C. v. Chicago InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004