In the Interest of D.M.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
This is an appeal from the Order of the Superior Court affirming the trial court’s order adjudicating appellant delinquent. The issue before this Court is whether, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Superior Court properly upheld the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress physical evi*557dence obtained pursuant to a stop and frisk.1 Because we find that police possessed the requisite reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk appellant for weapons, we affirm.
Our standard of review in addressing a challenge to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZhahirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.