Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2019No. 56 MAP 2017PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wecht

*921In a line of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence that began with the landmark decision in Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States has approved of "stop and frisk" practices as a limited departure from the requirement of probable cause and the necessity of warrants for searches and seizures. A cornerstone of modern law enforcement methods, "stop and frisk" is a practical tool designed to encourage the effective investigation and prevention of crime, while maintaining a balance between the constitutionally protected privacy interests…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Com. v. Malloy, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Smith, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Com. v. Brame, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Ross, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API