Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wecht
*921In a line of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence that began with the landmark decision in Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States has approved of "stop and frisk" practices as a limited departure from the requirement of probable cause and the necessity of warrants for searches and seizures. A cornerstone of modern law enforcement methods, "stop and frisk" is a practical tool designed to encourage the effective investigation and prevention of crime, while maintaining a balance between the constitutionally protected privacy interests…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Com. v. Malloy, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Smith, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Brame, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Ross, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.