Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1952No. 22310_1Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).1

1. The pertinent sections of the complaint may be summarized thus: The defendants, directors of the Farnsworth Company, published false statements of material facts concerning the financial condition of the company. This the defendants did to induce purchases of shares of stock in that company owned by them. Soon after defendants had sold all their shares of stock, the plaintiffs, misled by the false statements, purchased some Farnsworth shares on the stock exchange where Farnsworth stock was listed. When, later, the true facts about the company’s financial condition were…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Hughes v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API