Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1983No. 69062PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

In this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., the Court will determine whether a charging instrument purporting to allege an offense of theft denounced by V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 31.03(a) and (b)(1)1 must allege, as well *311as a specific intent to deprive, a culpable mental state with respect to appropriating property without the owner’s consent.2

Germane to our inquiry, the indictment alleges that appellant did

“unlawfully appropriate property . .. with the intent to deprive the Complainant of the property, and without the effective consent of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte PayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ex Parte SantellanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Celis, Mauricio RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  3. State v. Sandoval, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  4. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  5. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API