Ex Parte Smith
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
In this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., the Court will determine whether a charging instrument purporting to allege an offense of theft denounced by V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 31.03(a) and (b)(1)1 must allege, as well *311as a specific intent to deprive, a culpable mental state with respect to appropriating property without the owner’s consent.2
Germane to our inquiry, the indictment alleges that appellant did
“unlawfully appropriate property . .. with the intent to deprive the Complainant of the property, and without the effective consent of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte PayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ex Parte SantellanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Celis, Mauricio RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- State v. Sandoval, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
- United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.