Legal Opinion

Skiba v. Klaybor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1932No. Appeal, 67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The plaintiff filed a bill for the cancellation of a deed made by her father about four months before his death. Among other things, she averred lack of capacity in the grantor. The defendant is her brother, the grantee named in the deed. The money consideration is $1.00. The court decreed cancellation; defendant appeals.

As the parties agree on the rules of law applicable, recently stated in Pusic v. Salak, 261 Pa. 512, 518, 104 Atl. 751, and Hamilton v. Fay, 283 Pa. 175, 178, 128 Atl. 837, we shall not repeat them. Appellant also concedes that findings of fact made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Hamilton v. FaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Pusic v. SalakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orth v. DoenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API