Pusic v. Salak
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 141, Oct. T., 1917, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1915, No. 820, in equity, declaring cancellation of- deed in case of Steve Pusic v. Anna Salak, Mitro' Salak and Mary Pusic. . Bill in equity for cancellation of deed and accounting. Before Carnahan, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The lower court granted the relief prayed for. Defendants áppealed. Error assigned, among others, was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
This is a bill in equity to secure the cancellation of an alleged fraudulent deed and for other relief connected therewith. The defendants are plaintiff’s daughter and her husband and also plaintiff’s wife. The case was *515heard upon bill, answer, replication and testimony. The chancellor’s findings of the facts in favor of plaintiff were approved by the court below, and from final decree entered thereon, granting the relief prayed for, the defendants brought this appeal. The real question is, are the facts as found justified by the evidence? In our opinion they are.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strause v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Bierer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Davidson v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Cover & Wife v. ManawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Wagner v. FehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brandwene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gerfin v. Colonial Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Wagner v. Somerset County Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Laughlin v. McConnelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.