Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Vigil

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1944No. 4801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREET, Justice.

By leave of court, appellants filed their bill of review seeking to set aside, vacatG and hold for naught that certain judgment and decree rendered by the Fourth Judicial District Court within and for San Miguel County, New Mexico, on the 9th day of June, 1941 and affirmed by this court on April 29, 1942. Quintana v. Vigil et al., 46 N.M. 200, 125 P.2d 711. From an order sustaining the motion to strike the bill of review, appellants appeal.

The trial court, in sustaining the motion to strike, held:

“1. That no valid or substantial reason is shown why the alleged new or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quintana v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. Hall v. LowtherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Smith v. RuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Thorington v. ThoringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mettee v. BollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Ringle Development Corp. v. Town of Tome Land Grant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API