Legal Opinion

Scruggs v. ExxonMobil Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2009No. 08-6145PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Barbara Scruggs performed secretarial services for Exxon-Mobil for twenty-two years until her office in Oklahoma was closed in 2005. After the office closed, she filed this action pursuant 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1), seeking retroactive pension and savings benefits allegedly owed to her under two ExxonMobil employee benefits plans, ExxonMobil Pension Plan and ExxonMobil Savings Plan (collectively “the Plans”). 1 Because Scruggs performed her services for ExxonMobil as an independent contractor or while on the payroll of third-party companies, the plan…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kimber v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Madeline D. v. Anthem Health Plans of Ky., Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2019
  2. Cardoza v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Joseph F. v. Sinclair Services Co.District Court, D. Utah · 2016
  4. Hodges v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Craig v. Fed Ex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API