Legal Opinion

Craig v. Fed Ex Ground Package System, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 28, 2010No. Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM. MDL No. 1700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on FedEx’s motion for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of the plaintiffs’ ERISA claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The plaintiff drivers brought this class action suit against FedEx pursuant to ERISA’s denial of benefit provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B)). They claim FedEx violated ERISA by misclassiiying them as independent contractors instead of employees and so wrongfully denied them the right to participate in six different employee benefit plans.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Arthur Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  2. Boison v. Insurance Services Office, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Johnson v. Meriter Health Services Employee Retirement PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  4. Taylor v. Principal Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API