Hendricks v. Hendricks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*344Pless, J.
The plaintiffs asked several of the witnesses introduced by them, “Do you have an opinion satisfactory to yourself as to whether or not Daniel J. Hendricks . . . had sufficient mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of making a deed, its scope and effect, and know what land he was disposing of and to whom and how?” Over the objection of the defendants, the witnesses were permitted to say that they had such an opinion and that he (Mr. Hendricks) “did not.” The plaintiffs, Charles C. Hendricks, Austin H. Hendricks and Mrs. Aileen H. McCulloch so testified. In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MacKall v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Paine v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Willetts v. WillettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayes v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973