Legal Opinion

Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. v. Hiawassee River Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, I.,

after stating the facts as above: It required two weeks in the Superior Court to hear and to determine the matters herein litigated. The record on appeal to this Court is voluminous; it contains more than three hundred exceptions and assignments of error. After a careful and painstaking investigation of the whole matter, we have found no ruling or action on the part of the trial judge which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. In each cause, therefore, the judgment entered below must be affirmed.

The main contentions of the defendants are as follows:

1. That all these…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Bensley v. Mountain Lake Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Rouse v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Teeter v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Carolina Power and Light Company v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API