Fortner v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, J.
The only error assigned is that the court erred in denying the motion for a new trial, the grounds of which are that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and not supported by the evidence.
This motion and the order denying it appear in the record proper, but not in the bill of exceptions.
The rule is well settled in this jurisdiction, that a motion for a new' trial is not a part of the record proper, but must be embodied in the bill of exceptions, together with the ruling thereon and the exception to such ruling, in order to present to the appellate court for consideration an assignment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Revell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Palmore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925