Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 31, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree.

The only assignment of error is the denial of a motion for new trial. There is no duly authenticated bill of exceptions in the transcript; and as a motion for new trial can be considered by the appellate court only when it is prop erly incorporated in a bill of exceptions, (the assignment of error is unavailing. Revell v. State, 85 Fla. 402, 96 South. Rep. 156; Fortner v. State, 87 Fla. 198, 99 South. Rep. 553.

No error appears in the record proper, therefore the judgment should be affirmed. See B. F.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DeSoto Holding Co. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  3. Revell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. Anderson v. WinerSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  5. Bardwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API