Legal Opinion

Bethel Mills, Inc. v. Whitcomb

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 8, 1950No. 1236PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, C. J.

This is an action of contract to recover upon a running account between the parties. The defendant pleaded the general issue and the statute of limitations. Plaintiff filed a replication in which issue was joined on the general issue, and as to the statute of limitations that the defendant had been absent from the State of Vermont for a sufficient time to prevent the operation of the statute, to-wit, for the past seven years. Defendant thereupon filed a rejoinder setting forth that ever since the alleged indebtedness was incurred, the defendant had known property within the State which could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  2. City of Montpelier v. Town of CalaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  3. McAllister v. Northern Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  4. Kessler v. EmmelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of St. Johnsbury v. LaperleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  2. Weisburgh v. McClure Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. Maurice Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Bagalio v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  5. Town of Randolph v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API