Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Emmel

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

This action was brought to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident which is conceded to have occurred on December 11, 1942. Hearings were held by the court on motions made by the parties, by the clerk of the court, and by the officer who served the writ, directed to alleged errors and irregularities in the date of the writ and in the date of service as shown by the return thereon. It is not necessary to consider each of these motions.

After the other motions had been disposed of the defendant moved for judgment, and the court adjudged that the plaintiff’s cause of action was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glass v. StarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bethel Mills, Inc. v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  2. McAllister v. Northern Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API