Legal Opinion
Town of Randolph v. City of Barre
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 1, 1951No. 821PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlacicmer, J.
In this action of contract the plaintiff town seeks to recover from the defendant city for the support of a pauper residing in the plaintiff town but whose settlement is alleged to be in the defendant city. Specifications were filed which included items of expense paid for the pauper and also payments made by the plaintiff town to the State of Vermont under V. S. 47, § 9865 as assistance for the pauper’s children as needy children. The case was heard by the county court sitting without a jury; findings of fact were filed; judgment for the plaintiff was entered thereon; and the defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
- Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Abel's, Inc. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Stafford v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of St. Johnsbury v. LaperleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Town of Cambridge v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Barre City Hospital v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Town of Northfield v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952