Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Honorable Stanley A. Weigel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1970No. 25456PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or prohibition nullifying respondent’s order transferring a civil action to the District Court for the District of Maine under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a). Petitioner has made a forceful presentation in this court in support of two contentions not advanced in the district court.

The first is that because the action was filed in a Superior Court of the State of California, and removed to the court below on the ground of diversity, the criteria to be applied in considering the motion for transfer should be those which would have been applied by the state court in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. Bryant Kasey and Mary Ann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Edward Allen White v. Wayne McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. George J. Malhiot, and Marjorie M. Malhiot v. Southern California Retail Clerks Union and Drug Employer Pension and Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API