Legal Opinion

George J. Malhiot, and Marjorie M. Malhiot v. Southern California Retail Clerks Union and Drug Employer Pension and Trust Fund

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1984No. 83-6010PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Senior District Judge:

Appellant Marjorie Malhiot is a beneficiary of the Southern California Drug Benefit Fund (Fund), created under a collective bargaining agreement. The Fund (appel-lee) denied medical benefits to Marjorie and her husband, George Malhiot. The district court affirmed the denial, and the Malhiots appealed. We affirm. We also assess costs and attorney’s fees against the Malhi-ots’ attorneys.

Facts

Marjorie Malhiot is employed by Thrifty Corporation. Thrifty employees are beneficiaries of the Fund, which receives employer contributions and provides medical benefits to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Barnd v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Dewitt v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Hugh Wendell MacDonald v. James A. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Honorable Stanley A. Weigel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Lawrence B. Ordower v. Leonard Feldman, and Sinclair Global Brokerage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. United States of America v. Kenneth W. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Barbara A. Dytrt v. The Mountain State Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API