Legal Opinion
United States v. Norwood
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 29, 2014No. Case No. 12-CR-20287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO PRECLUDE THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSED EXPERTS (Dkts. 211 and 263)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions to exclude the Government’s proposed experts (Dkts. 211 and 263). Defendants challenge two proposed expert witnesses disclosed by the Government: DEA Special Agent Scott Nedoff and FBI Special Agent Robert Bornstein. The Government proposes to call Nedoff to provide expert testimony on the sale and distribution of drugs, and Bornstein is to provide…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- James Nelson, (Each and Every in This Class Action Suit) v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company El Paso Tennessee Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. David CasillasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- EEOC v. The Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Gary G. v. Gavin NewsomDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- University of Tennessee Research Foundation v. Caelum Biosciences, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024