Legal Opinion
Hayter v. Travelers Indemnity Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 4, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01469Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD HAYTER, Case No. 3:24-cv-01469-AB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company, STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company, and AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut insurance company, Defendants. BAGGIO, District Judge: On August 24, 2021, following an accident with an uninsured motorist, Plaintiff Richard Hayter filed an uninsured motorist (“UM”) claim with Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company, by and through its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Richard D. Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.