Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Brilliant Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 29, 1948PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff, in this action of contract sought to recover for alleged overcharges arising out of the repair of his boat by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The principal question for decision *527is whether the judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The case is a cross action and was tried with an action in which the defendant here was plaintiff and the plaintiff here was defendant. In the latter case the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff (defendant here) but it need not concern us, for the bill of exceptions now before us…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Rosenfeld v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Hinckley v. Town of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wadsworth v. Boston Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- PGR Management Co. v. CredleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Food Specialties, Inc. v. John C. Dowd, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Governor Apartments, Inc. v. CarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. ClemonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.