Legal Opinion

Button v. Button

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1988No. 17PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

On this appeal, we are asked to reconsider the rule regarding the partition of property held as tenants by the entireties, as first set forth in Vento v. Vento, 256 Pa.Super. 91, 389 A.2d 615 (1978), and as later extended in Clingerman v. Sadowski, 335 Pa.Super. 514, 485 A.2d 11 (1984). Appellants urge us to further extend the rule to permit the estate of a deceased spouse to accept a constructive offer for the severance of joint property, based upon egregious circumstances.

Because we find that appellants have been barred by the doctrine of res judicata from further pursuing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Duquesne Slag Products Co. v. LenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Richmond v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. OsellanieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API