Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardage
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 9, 1987No. CIV-86-1401-WPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEE R. WEST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America, moves the Court to reconsider and to modify its Order of December 11, 1986 in the above-referenced case, pursuant to Local Rule 9, on the ground the Court misconstrues the limited protection sought by the United States’ original Motion for Protective Order. The government states “the Court broadly addressed questions of record review not at issue in the Motion and concluded that a de novo review of Environmental Protection Agency’s (hereinafter “EPA”) remedy selection process under CERCLA is appropriate in this case.” The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ottati & Goss, Inc., United States of America v. Ottati & Goss, Inc., Appeal of State of New Hampshire, Intervenor/plaintiffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. HardageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.