Legal Opinion

Arthur West v. Port Of Tacoma

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 28, 2014No. 71366-3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON o CD </>o s» m ARTHUR WEST, ) o5 ) No. 71366-3-1 no CO ^~D. Appellant, ) >> ~jj. 33 c/>m; ) DIVISION ONE = > —vr J—- MM* v. ) fY> acn HO ) XT en O Z-< — CONNIE BACON, CLARE PETRICH ) DON JOHNSON, TED BOTTINGER ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION TIM FARKELL, RICHARD NARZANO, ) MARK LINDQUIST, PIERCE COUNTY ) PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, and ) PORT OF TACOMA, ) ) Respondents. ) FILED: April 28. 2014 Spearman, C.J. — A trial court may dismiss a case for want of prosecution under CR 41(b)(1) unless the case is noted for trial before the hearing on the motion to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason ContractorsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rivers v. STATE CONF. OF MASON CONTRACTORSWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API