Legal Opinion
Powell v. Associated Counsel for Accused
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 4, 2008No. 60276-4-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
191 P.3d 896 (2008)
Clint L. POWELL, individually, Appellant,
v.
ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR the ACCUSED, aka ACA, a Washington State corporation; Todd M. Gruenhagen and Jane Doe Gruenhagen, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; George Eppler and Jane Doe Eppler, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents, and
John Does 1-4, Defendants.
No. 60276-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 9, 2008.
Publication Ordered September 4, 2008.
Larry James Landry, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Christopher Holm Howard, Allison Kathleen…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Piris v. KitchingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Christopher Piris v. Alfred KitchingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015