Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Stern Bros. & Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

The question posed for determination is whether appellants’ notice of appeal from the order of the court below staying arbitration was timely under the provisions of section 612 of the Civil Practice Act. This turns on whether the time to appeal commenced running from the date the order was entered or from the date appellants received from their adversary a copy of the very order they themselves had submitted, with notice of entry.

Respondent served its proposed order providing for a stay of arbitration, with notice of settlement, on April 16, 1956, while appellants served their counter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Matter of the N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Kilmer v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. George A. Moore & Co. v. HeymannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Corporation of Frederick Scholes v. Theodore Ficke Warehouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of Estate of HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API