Legal Opinion

George A. Moore & Co. v. Heymann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

On this appeal there is a motion to dismiss on the part of the respondent. The motion to dismiss is based upon the ground that at the time the plaintiff’s motion was granted the defendant submitted an order, although the motion was decided against him; that this order of his was signed, and that these circumstances bring defendant within the general provisions of the Civil Practice Act, section 612. That section limits the time to appeal to thirty days after service upon the attorney for the appellant of a copy of the judgment or order appealed from and a written notice of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Ladue v. Goodhead, New York County Courts1943
  3. People ex rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. People ex rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In re the Arbitration between Stern Bros. & LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API