Legal Opinion

Curran v. Burkhardt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of tort under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 140, § 155, as appearing in St. 1934, c. 320, § 18, to recover damages against the defendant as the owner or keeper of a dog which, the plaintiff alleges, seized the leg of his trousers as he was walking in front of the defendant’s premises, and then got between his legs, causing him to fall to the sidewalk with such violence as to fracture his hip. The defendant excepted to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict. The plaintiff had a verdict.

The plaintiff in order to recover was required to show that his injuries were caused by a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burns v. WinchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Sullivan v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Canavan v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Maillet v. MininnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Arlington Trust Co. v. Le VineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carey v. Planning Board of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Malchanoff v. TruehartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Koller v. DugganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Burgess v. UzarinsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Duff v. ChartierMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API