Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 16, 1992No. 1-90-1498PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, J.D. Young, appeals his jury conviction of possession of a controlled substance (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56½, par. 1402), arguing that (1) the court’s coercion of a defense witness deprived him of due process; (2) the defense witness was not entitled to invoke his fifth amendment privilege; and (3) defendant’s cross-examination of witnesses was restricted improperly.

Defendant and his accomplice, Gene Raper, were charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56½, par.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HunterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. MaldonadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EdgestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. BlalockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. People v. VaughnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Ewing v. WillsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API