Legal Opinion

Petersen v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1986No. WCB 83-05423; CA A33543PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*169ROSSMAN, J.

This is an occupational disease claim in which claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board decision which affirmed the referee’s determination that claimant’s mental disorder is not compensable. On de novo review, we reverse.

In February, 1983, claimant, a billing clerk for the city of Myrtle Point, filed a claim form indicating that she was unable to work due to “stress, job harassment and undermining of the city administrator.” The claim was denied.

Claimant testified at the hearing that her troubles at work started in September, 1981, when a new city administrator was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System LaundryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Vaughn v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Duran v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Petersen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API