Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1992No. A92A1647PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Michael Holland and his cousin Mark were jointly indicted for manufacturing marijuana. OCGA § 16-13-30 (j) (1). Michael was convicted and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the validity of certain jury charges.

1. The evidence proves that Michael manufactured marijuana.

On a tip, sheriff’s deputies, GBI agents, and drug task force members found marijuana growing in two wooded patches near Michael’s home. It is on seven acres owned by his father which had been used by family as a residence for forty to fifty years.

One patch was located along an old firebreak about 600…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Lovell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Galbreath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Gilliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Crumpton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API