Holland v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Michael Holland and his cousin Mark were jointly indicted for manufacturing marijuana. OCGA § 16-13-30 (j) (1). Michael was convicted and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the validity of certain jury charges.
1. The evidence proves that Michael manufactured marijuana.
On a tip, sheriff’s deputies, GBI agents, and drug task force members found marijuana growing in two wooded patches near Michael’s home. It is on seven acres owned by his father which had been used by family as a residence for forty to fifty years.
One patch was located along an old firebreak about 600…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Lovell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Galbreath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Gilliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Crumpton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.