Legal Opinion

State v. Alvarado

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1990No. S90G0840PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider how the concepts of “actual” possession and “constructive” possession, and the requirement that both types of possession be “knowing,” apply in a cocaine trafficking case.

At the time that the alleged offense occurred, OCGA § 16-13-31 required proof of “actual” possession to constitute trafficking, whereas either actual or constructive possession constituted the offense of possession of a controlled substance under OCGA § 16-13-30. The defendant asserted that he lacked knowledge of the presence of cocaine in the automobile which he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StonakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Santone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Leeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Reinhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API