Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Interior Regional Housing Authority

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2006No. S-11665PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Vernon Solomon filed suit in federal court against the Interior Regional Housing Authority (IRHA), alleging violations of a federal Indian employment preference and of Alaska worker’s compensation law. The federal court found that the statute created no private cause of action, dismissing Solomon’s federal claims with prejudice and dismissing his state law claims without prejudice. Solomon appealed the federal claim to the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed. Four months after the Ninth Circuit denied his motion for reconsideration, Solomon filed his Alaska…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kaiser v. Umialik InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Clemensen v. Providence Alaska Medical CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Krause v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Alex v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API