Legal Opinion

Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1989No. S-2456PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether the superior court erred in dismissing three former employees’ statutory wage claims on the ground that the statute of limitations had expired. The wage claimants argue that (1) Department of Labor (DOL) proceedings are an alternative administrative remedy that they were required to pursue and (2) the statute of limitations is equitably tolled during the pendency of a DOL investigation. We reverse the judgment for the employer and remand for resolution of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brown v. WoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kaiser v. Umialik InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mathis v. SauserAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API