Legal Opinion
State v. Oligney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1925No. 24,539PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, 0.
Defendant demurred to an information charging him with a violation of the Motor Vehicle Act, L. 1923, p. 596, c. 418, § 24. The demurrer was overruled and the case certified to this court pursuant to section 9251, G. S. 1913, these questions being submitted for answer:
Does the information state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense?
Are the allegations of said information stated with such a degree of certainty as to enable the court to pronounce judgment according to the rights of the case?
Does chapter 418, p. 596, L. 1923, impose a tax upon foreign motor vehicles used solely…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hassler v. EngbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Raymond v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. LefebvreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- American Railway Express Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.