Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Mayor of New York

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided September 4, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This suit is brought upon patent No. 48,920, granted May 24, 1864, on an application filed May 13,1864, to James Knibbs, assignor, for a relief-valve in steam fire-engine pumps. It was heard in 1881, and the patent was sustained notwithstanding evidence that the Amoskoag Manufacturing Company of Manchester, N. H., had constructed and sold engines containing the invention more than two years before the application for the patent, because one was made to contain it at the request of the inventor lor experiment, and the others were made to contain it and sold without his consent and allowance.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Eastman v. Mayor of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  3. Campbell v. Mayor of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
  4. Winslow Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Gauge Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
  5. Huntington Dry-Pulverizer Co. v. Newell Universal Mill Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API