Legal Opinion

Smith v. Butler

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 23, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-3273-WDPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WOODLOCK, District Judge.

Instructing the jury in a murder case sixteen years ago, a Massachusetts state superior court judge defined the concept of reasonable doubt by employing forms of explanation which are now recognized as erroneous in the federal courts of this Circuit. The question whether the errors in his reasonable doubt instruction justify a new trial has been presented by the defendant to the state courts without success. The issue comes before me belatedly through the state habeas corpus jurisdiction of the federal courts, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Under controlling case law, I…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric Arthur Walton, United States of America v. Eldridge Mayfield, A/K/A SippyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. Oses v. Com. of Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  3. Breese v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. Adriano Vargas v. John P. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Adriano Vargas v. John P. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API