Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Adriano Vargas v. John P. Keane

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 30, 1996No. 877, Docket 95-2079Published

1ConcurrenceWeinstein, District Judge

While concurring with the judgement and rationale of the majority opinion, I add these comments to explain the alternate route by which I arrive at the same result.

Following the post-argument conference with the other members of the panel where affirmance was agreed upon, a Questionnaire, infra, was distributed by the concurring judge on his own motion to twelve jurors and four alternates. They had been selected after a full voir dire; represented an excellent cross-section of citizens in the Eastern District of New York; were observed by the court to be highly responsible in exercising their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. FaticoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. United States v. Charles W. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Daniel OriakhiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. John Russell Thompson v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API