Legal Opinion

State v. Lang

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1992No. 923SC77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant presents three arguments on appeal. First, defendant contends the court erred by denying his motion for nonsuit on the grounds that the State failed to present sufficient evidence of each element of the crime charged. We disagree.

The elements of obtaining property by false pretense are that the defendant (1) obtained or attempted to obtain value from another, (2) by a false representation of a past or subsisting fact or of a future fulfillment or event, (3) which was intended and calculated to deceive, and (4) which does, in fact, deceive. State v. Cronin, 299 N.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. LouchheimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. WorkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  2. Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API