Legal Opinion
Lawson v. Getty Terminals Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1994No. 93 Civ. 3344(SWK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this employment discrimination action, defendants Getty Terminals Corp. (“Getty”) and Gordon Rodgers (“Rodgers”) move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety. Alternatively, defendants move, pursuant to Rule 56, for partial summary judgment (1) dismissing that portion of the complaint that fails to establish a prima facie case; (2) dismissing plaintiffs claim for punitive damages; and (3) limiting compensatory damages to the sum of $50,-000. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lumhoo v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Duprey v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Castro v. Local 1199, National Health & Human Services Employees UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sharon Wharton v. Gorman-Rupp CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.