Legal Opinion
Sharon Wharton v. Gorman-Rupp Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 11, 2009No. 08-3644UnpublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Sharon Wharton appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, defendant The Gorman-Rupp Company, on her claims of age discrimination and retaliation for complaining about age and sex discrimination, under Ohio Rev.Code Ann. §§ 4112.14(A) and 4112.02(1). Wharton contends that Gorman-Rupp’s rejection of her application for the position of executive administrative assistant was motivated by age-based discrimination, as evidenced by comments made to her by the company’s vice-president of human resources. She also alleges that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lovell v. Champion Car Wash, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- O'Donnell v. N.E. Ohio Neighborhood Health Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Wholf v. Tremco, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Amstutz v. Liberty Center Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.