Legal Opinion

Cross v. Moehring

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1989No. 4-89-0240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Plaintiffs, Terry Cross and Jenny Cross, appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their case against defendant Muriel Wolland (Muriel) for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that Muriel placed an advertising sign at an intersection that blocked the view of the cross-traffic. Plaintiff Terry Cross and the other defendant were involved in an automobile accident at that intersection. Plaintiffs allege that Muriel’s placement of the sign constituted a breach of the duty of care Muriel owed to the plaintiffs.

We disagree and affirm.

Plaintiff Terry Cross (Terry)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S & F CORP. v. American Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Pyne v. WitmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Lemings v. Collinsville School District Number TenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Esworthy v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Ording v. SpringerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Stanmar, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Milz v. M.J. Meadows, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. O'NEIL v. KruppAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Manning v. HazekampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Adame v. MunozAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API