Legal Opinion

O'NEIL v. Krupp

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1992No. 3-91-0449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

Plaintiff, Daniel O’Neil, appeals the dismissal of four counts of his amended complaint which alleged that defendants Jerry and Barbara Schultz breached their statutory duty of care to plaintiff’s decedent by violating two city ordinances. We reverse and remand.

On August 7, 1989, plaintiff’s 14-year-old son, James O’Neil, was riding his bike through the intersection of 15th Street and Gilman Avenue in Mendota, Illinois, when he was struck and killed by a car driven by codefendant Irene Krupp. Krupp’s vision was allegedly impaired by a line of shrubs and foliage growing on a corner lot at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bier v. Leanna Lakeside Property Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Blankenship v. Peoria Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Martin v. Ortho PharmaceuticalsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Workman v. DinkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. Hackett v. CostaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API