Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kansas City
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
Decided July 4, 1908No. 8,720PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The bill presented in this case by complainant seeks a decretal order against defendants, restraining and enjoining them from proceeding further in an attempt made to condemn and take over the waterworks plant of complainant located and operated by it in the defendant city. The endeavor of the city to possess itself of this water plant of' complainant is made under the provisions of chapter 33, p. 30, Laws (Special Session) 1908, of the Legislature of this state, entitled “An act relating to cities of the first class having a population of more than fifty thousand…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dillon Real Estate Co. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State ex rel. Miller v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960