Legal Opinion

Dillon Real Estate Co. v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2007No. 95,162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

This case arises out of the City of Topeka’s efforts to unilaterally annex property pursuant to K.S.A. 12-520. The property is located within both the Mission Township and the Sherwood Improvement District, a district created by Shawnee County pur suant to K.S.A. 19-2753. Dillon Real Estate Co., Inc. (Dillon) owns part of the annexed property.

The City’s attempt greatly relies upon consents to annexation filed by Dillon’s predecessors approximately 8 years earlier. Dillon, however, did not consent. Along with the improvement district and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Hawley v. Kansas Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Manly v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Polson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Ruhland v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. In Re the Tax Appeal of Dillon Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API